Dealing with a hangover of Public Archaeology: Scattered thoughts on the Italian ‘Archeologia Pubblica’

Francesca Benetti

Abstract


Public Archaeology is a young discipline, we all know that. It’s even younger in Italy, where public archaeology has not even reached ‘adulthood’. Cited for the first time by Armando De Guio in 2000 (De Guio and Bressan 2000), it was only a decade later that Public Archaeology has started to become ‘a thing’, thanks to some pioneering experiences at the University of Florence (Bonacchi 2009; Vannini 2011), and especially after a national conference in 2012 (in Florence: see Zuanni 2013 for a summary). Italian archaeologists’ first reaction was to overlap the new discipline with the experiences already in place, which in Italy were under the category of ‘valorizzazione’ (enhancement). They were not exactly the same: while Public Archaeology is characterised by a reflection on the objectives of the research from the very start, a focus on having a reliable methodology, and a strong element linked to evaluation, ‘enhancement’ experiences – while often valuable and successful – lacked the same structure and reliability. This is probably due to an underestimation of these practices as a scientific topic, thus deserving the same structure required for any other type of research. Often this resulted in a mere description of the activities carried out, with a generic objective like ‘increasing the knowledge of archaeology in the public sphere’ without really evaluating if the activities worked or not. Public Archaeology became a sort of a trendy subject, outdating the term ‘valorizzazione’, at least in most of the university milieu, and creating confusion on the subject and the methodology. This sometimes has led to a sort of ‘hangover’ effect, similar to what happens with summer songs: they sound fun when you first hear them, but after months you just want to move on! Few doctoral theses awarded in Archaeology have been devoted to topics related to Public Archaeology up to the present date and the risk is that after this ‘hangover’ the subject will be penalised in comparison to others.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Benetti, F. 2020. Il diritto di partecipare. Aspetti giuridici del rapporto tra pubblico e archeologia (PCA Studies 3). Mantova, SAP Società Archeologica.

Bonacchi, C. 2009. Archeologia pubblica in Italia. Origini e prospettive di un ‘nuovo’ settore disciplinare. Ricerche Storiche 2–3, 329–50.

Bonacini, E. 2012. La visibilità sul web del patrimonio culturale siciliano. Criticità e prospettive attraverso un survey on line. Catania, Maimone.

Bonacini, E. 2016. Il Museo Salinas: un case study di social museum… a porte chiuse. Il capitale culturale XIII, 225–66.

Brogiolo, G.P., and Chavarría Arnau, A. 2019. Archaeology for local communities in Northern Italy: experiences of participatory research in an adverse legal framework. European Journal of Post-Classical Archaeologies 9, 101–22.

Chavarría Arnau, A. 2018. Ricerca partecipata in archeologia: l’esperienza delle summer schools dell’Oltresarca trentino. In A. Chavarría Arnau & M.-A. Causarano (eds.), La memoria culturale dell’Oltresarca trentino. Paesaggi, persone e storie di pietre. Mantova, SAP Società Archeologica, 9–20.

Consiglio, S. and Riitano, A. (eds.) 2015. Sud innovation. Patrimonio culturale, innovazione sociale e nuova cittadinanza. Torino, Franco Angeli.

Corolla, A. 2019. La città di Arechi: il rinnovamento dell’identità civica e lo scavo archeologico di San Pietro a Corte a Salerno. In M. Nucciotti, C. Bonacchi & C. Molducci (eds.), Archeologia Pubblica in Italia. Firenze, Firenze University Press, 51–58.

Dal Maso, C. 2018. Five years of Digital Invasions, and they do not cease to amaze and innovate. Archeostorie. Journal of Public Archaeology 2, 141–44.

De Guio, A. and Bressan, C. 2000. Tra ‘archeologie événementielle’ e ‘longue durée’: il caso di studio delle calcare dell’altopiano di Asiago (VI). Archeologia Postmedievale 4, 73–86.

Innocenti, A. 2018. Archaeology and Cultural Routes: a relationship to develop. Archeostorie. Journal of Public Archaeology 2, 75–88.

Lazzerini, L. 2019. Archeologia Pubblica in Italia. Osservazioni sulla percezione di un settore in cerca di una definizione nazionale. In M. Nucciotti, C. Bonacchi & C. Molducci (eds.), Archeologia Pubblica in Italia. Firenze, Firenze University Press, 173–82.

Manacorda, D. 2020. Patrimonio culturale, libertà, democrazia. Pensieri sparsi di un archeologo incompetente a proposito di Diritto e gestione del patrimonio culturale. Il capitale culturale 21, 15–57.

Morandini, F., Stovali M. and Abbiati, M. 2018. In the Lombards’ footsteps: Proposals for educational visits to localities in the UNESCO serial site “The Longobards in Italy. Places of power (AD 568-774)”. Archeostorie. Journal of Public Archaeology 2, 115–24.

Nizzo, V. 2017. Da Ferrara a Faro: esperienze e strategie per la costruzione di una percezione partecipata dell’archeologia. In S. Pallecchi (ed.), Raccontare l’archeologia. Strategie e tecniche per la comunicazione dei risultati delle ricerche archeologiche. Sesto Fiorentino, All’Insegna del Giglio, 71–84.

Pinna, F. 2019. Archeologia e costruzione partecipata dell’identità locale: percorsi di archeologia di comunità in Sardegna. European Journal of Post-Classical Archaeologies 9, 123–46.

Ripanti, F. 2017. Italian public archaeology on fieldwork: an overview. Archeostorie. Journal of Public Archaeology 1, 93–104.

Ripanti, F. 2020. Toward an Intermediate Level: Making the Most of Evaluation in Italian Community Archaeology. Public Archaeology 1–22.

Sanna Montanelli, M. 2018. Per una data quality nelle pratiche di crowdsourcing applicate alla ricerca archeologica. In F. Sogliani, B. Gargiulo, E. Annunziata and V. Vitale (eds.), VIII Congresso Nazionale di Archeologia Medievale. Pré-tirages (Matera, 12-15 settembre 2018). Vol. 1: Sezione 1, Teoria e metodi dell’archeologia medievale; Sezione 2, Insediamenti urbani e architettura. Sesto Fiorentino, All’Insegna del Giglio, 25–27.

Sgarlata, M. 2016. L’eradicazione degli artropodi. La politica dei beni culturali in Sicilia. Bari, Edipuglia.

Valenti, M. 2016. “We invest in Public Archaeology”. The Poggibonsi Archaeodrome project: an alliance between people, Municipality and University. European Journal of Post-Classical Archaeologies 6, 417–30.

Valenti, M. 2018. Dalle fonti alla narrazione. Ricostruzione storica per il racconto della quotidianità. Problemi e prospettive. In M. Valenti, S. Ricci and V. Fronza (eds.), Dalle fonti alla narrazione. Ricostruzione storica per il racconto della quotidianità. Sesto Fiorentino, All’Insegna del Giglio, 7–40.

Vannini, G. (ed.) 2011. Archeologia pubblica in Toscana: un progetto e una proposta. Atti del workshop (Firenze, 12 luglio 2010). Firenze, Firenze University Press.

Volpe, G. 2016. Un patrimonio italiano: beni culturali, paesaggio e cittadini. Novara, Utet.

Volpe, G. 2020. Archeologia Pubblica. Metodi, Tecniche, Esperienze. Roma, Carocci.

Zuanni, C. 2013. Archeologia Pubblica in Italia (Florence, 2012), AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology 3, 134–38.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23914/ap.v10i0.294

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Francesca Benetti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2171-6315

Follow us on:

Journal edited by JAS Arqueología